Tar Sands and the FQD – and now: Serbian oil shale threats

January 29th, 2012

Excellent news: 18th January Obama rejected TransCanada’s application for the Keystone XL pipeline (for connecting the Alberta Tar Sands with the Mexican Gulf for export of tar sands fuel worldwide including to UK and the EU). But the US State Department said this does not preclude a re-application with a different route (to avoid the Ogallala aquifer). Obama stated that “The rushed and arbitrary deadline insisted on by Congressional Republicans prevented a full assessment of the pipeline’s impact, especially the health and safety of the American people, as well as our environment”. TransCanada announced they will re-apply. Let’s hope we don’t get a Republican President elected in November – as their climate denying or sceptic candidates support the KXL and most Republican Congressmen have been ‘bought’ by Big Oil such as by the infamous Koch Brothers (Tea Party funders & founders). Assessment by The UK Tar Sands Network.

Also – Canadian First Nations are making an effective united stand against the proposed pipeline from the Tar Sands towards the Pacific (and thus China).

The FQD: EU member states are meeting on 23rd February towards a vote on the Fuel Quality Directive (FQD) – legislation that would strongly discourage tar sands fuel from entering the UK and EU. I say ‘towards’ – as we are unclear whether the vote might again be delayed – not just by Norman Baker’s alternative methodology – but now by another alternative proposal – this time by the Netherlands (home of Royal Dutch Shell) – as another spanner in the works to derail the FQD.

More good news: Tim Farron has met Simon Hughes (former LibDem shadow for Env & CC) on the FQD and tar sands and has decided “to bid for a question to the Secretary of State on this issue at the next session of Energy and Climate Change questions in the House of Commons” and discuss it with Norman Baker. Unfortunately I have learnt that many LibDem MPs and the GreenLibDem tweeter still find it hard to believe that Norman Baker could work to scupper the FQD. I will now have to try and persuade the GreenLibDems that his actions threaten the FQD – at least by unacceptable delay, and in December I wrote a critical assessment of Norman Baker’s statements which has been emailed to LibDems. We would like the GreenLibDems to support Tim Farron and Chris Davies MEP on this matter.

If you have a spare moment do email Tim Farron that you are very pleased he has decided to pursue this matter (and for signing the moratorium on fracking EDM).

One point I am emphasizing is the urgency for the FQD to be implemented before investment decisions (and pipeline permits) for high-carbon unconventional oil infrastructure are made – which are largely export dependent and thus influence-able by an effective FQD.

A recent new example of this urgency is that “by 2012” the Serbian Government is announcing “corporate players” interested in entering the race to extract shale oil from Serbia. Shale oil life-cycle emissions are 50% higher than for conventional oil according to the EU Commissioner’s proposal for the FQD – which Norman Baker is delaying. Also – the extraction process is highly destructive and polluting.

For more info on these subjects see www.dragonfly1.plus.com/#blog – which also links to the UK Tar Sands website and tweets.

Fracking good news and Climate denialism

January 29th, 2012

Fracking – good news

Tim Farron wrote (24jan12) that he has signed EDM 2292 “HYDRAULIC FRACTURING (FRACKING) (No. 2)” for a moratorium to be placed on this environmentally risky process at least until a detailed EIA has been published http://www.parliament.uk/edm/2010-12/2292.
Well done to all those who wrote or visited MPs in response to e.g. ‘The Take Fracking Action!’ in SLACC’s November Newsletter.
44 MPs have signed so far (27jan12) – but not a single Conservative (what does that tell you?!).

On 24th January’s BBC Radio4’s Today programme there was a c.7minute debate on shale gas exploitation and climate change between Tony Juniper and climate change denialist Lord Nigel Lawson in which Juniper gave a strong case and Lawson … well – judge for yourself: 2:42 to c.2:49 in bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episod….

This might urge you to sign and tweet this petition to tell pro-fracking Lawson’s climate sceptic thinktank ‘The Global Warming Policy Foundation’ to disclose its funders: http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/tell-climate-sceptic-think-tank-to-disclose-funding/. This backs an FoI request by leading climate scientists for this information which hopefully went before a judge today (27th): http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2012/jan/23/climate-sceptic-lawson-thinktank-funding. Lawson and his GWPF are favoured climate writers by the Daily Mail, and you probably agree that Lawson gets too much climate airtime on BBC!

More on www.dragonfly1.plus.com/

New year, new projects – and what really happens at a HUB meeting

January 29th, 2012

Our first meeting of the year went all too quickly – so much to discuss and so many projects to organise. We kicked off with brief updates on our bids for funds. We moved on to current activities – volunteer project leaders explained the plans and what help would be needed and then set up their “stalls” to talk to small groups. We then moved round the room, finding out more about each project and working out how which ones fitted best with our own skills and interests. There are still some gaps to fill so please do sign up to do one small thing to join in and/or help.

The really high turnout meant we had plenty of participants for three discussion groups. Led by volunteers, we looked at the implications for SLACCtt of:
the nuclear approach put forward by George Monbiot (see http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/dec/05/sellafield-nuclear-energy-solution for the article that sparked the debate); ….
The sustainable Brampton Household survey (see www.sustainablebrampton.org); and
how can we manage, analyse and make use of all the information that we are bombarded with from all directions?

Energy levels still high, we moved around and chose a different debate topic, adding to the comments/feedback of the earlier participants.

A few minutes for members to update us on other plans and invitations and the hall’s closing time was upon us. Discussions were still going on outside as we cleared up the room and made our exit.

Our conclusions?
The nuclear debate was fascinating. John summed it up as follows: “ Not many years ago, there would not have been a single pro-nuclear voice in a green movement. Last night I judged it was almost an even split – on the one hand, fears about nuclear accidents and the nuclear waste legacy; on the other hand, fears about irreversible climate change. Choosing which is the lesser evil between two planet-threatening options is not easy… It was also good to hear (SLACCtt member) Fiona talk with obvious authority about the pitfalls in George Monbiot’s approach. People wanted to hear the two of them debate the subject, so they could balance the arguments themselves. Fascinating stuff. We need to surface more of the experts lurking in the SLACCtt membership.”

Who knows – could we tempt George M to Cumbria for a public debate?

The Brampton debate focused on how useful it would be to follow this approach in South Lakes.
- Worth it for the baseline data but then needs to be on-going to be really useful
- Option of smaller surveys e.g. of traffic to measure specific impacts
- Quite a lot of work – option of recruiting a University student to complete this
- Government statistics are available for e.g South Lakeland that might be relevant
On the other hand:
- Issue of a small number of `anomalies` massively influencing the overall results
- Issue of how much of real costs, carbon component, etc can be captured in this way.

We also asked ourselves:
- Is this sort of data the best way to promote real change?
- Would our time, energy, money be better spent on interviewing people to discover what they see would make them change (rather than what we think would…!)
- And we concluded we should find out more – particularly the value of focus groups amongst peers/community groups discussing what changes have benefited them and why (viz CRAGS ) and then share outcomes publicly.

And finally, the information management debate – we’ve 3 pages of suggestions on information management and we’re focussing in on how we can use our website as a resource share knowledge e.g. with reviews of articles/books – maybe with a “members only” section of the site. The idea of a “green book club” gained support as did revitalising “green drinks”. And we’d love to know more about our members’ knowledge and skills so that we can help each other.

Thanks to all for your contributions and in particular to Chris, Karen and John for leading discussions and to Fiona for her invaluable input to the “nuclear” debate. (Thanks to Jo for facilitating, and writing this post.)

Ban Tar Sands

November 24th, 2011

URGENT! On 2nd December EU member states meet to vote on whether to implement what will effectively be a ban on the import of very high emissions fuels (such as from The Tar Sands) into the EU. However – the UK government wants this implementation (of the Fuel Quality Directive) blocked or delayed until the imports have become a fixed reality or ‘locked in’ (as the IEA’s Birol puts it). It will only take you about 5 minutes or so to ‘sign’ and ‘send’ the template email provided by People & Planet to go to Minister Norman Baker to urge him against this folly: http://www.peopleandplanet.org/tarsands/takeaction/eu-ban

CO2 emissions in extracting oil from the Tar Sands in Alberta are an incredible 4.9 times higher than from conventional sources, making the whole ‘life-cycle emissions’ (‘wells to wheels’ including combustion) as 23% higher (source: EU commissioned peer-reviewed report by Adam Brandt). We must keep this dirty fuel out of Europe! If you have more time – please email Tim Farron tim@timfarron.co.uk or even tweet him (@timfarron) to urge Norman Baker (LibDem) not to obstruct the Fuel Quality Directive.

Would you like to make Kendal a Tar Free Town? Click here to find out more: http://www.tarfreetowns.org/what-is-a-tar-free-town/

Do also have a look at ‘Kendal’s’ Tar Sands website: www.dragonfly1.plus.com – includes amusing animation!

Camp Frack

September 26th, 2011

Camp Frack, for me, began on Friday morning; I got a lorry stuck in the mud; shifted what felt like hundreds of tables and chairs; tried to put up marquees which were missing guy ropes and central beams and all in the pouring rain. But at least I hadn’t spent the previous day and night driving around the country to collect all this stuff like some fellow ‘slaccers’ had! But Camp Frack was worth this effort a hundred times over – easily. Fracking releases methane (25 times more damaging than C02), poisons water supplies, pollutes the air causing respiratory problems and has been linked to earthquakes. There is no place for it in the ‘energy mix’.

Like many people I hadn’t heard of fracking until relatively recently. Not really a surprise considering even people living within a couple of miles radius of a Fracking test site (owned by Cuadrilla Resources) knew nothing about it either until a massive drilling rig appeared. There was a notice from the planning department, just one I think, it was placed on a telegraph pole (field side not road side) halfway up a private road.

So I went to Camp Frack to learn more about this extreme form of energy; show support for local people opposing it and network with others to build a strong, effective campaign. I think anyone that was there would say the weekend was a complete success; I definitely achieved my aims.

Camp Frack was a very well thought out event; Saturday morning consisted of a welcome meeting first thing then a variety of workshops ran till mid-afternoon. There were workshops on Fracking, films, introduction to direct action; using social networking sites for campaigning, banner making; the list goes on… Late afternoon was the highlight for me; there was a meeting which saw Camp Frack split into three groups to look at a national campaign against fracking, local campaigns and direct action. This felt really smart; good co-ordinated strategic work! The smaller groups had over an hour together before re-joining as a whole and feeding back. Obviously I can’t reveal the ins and outs of these meetings, but I can tell you that I don’t think the fracking industry stands a chance against us!

To keep the momentum from these discussions, lots of working groups were set up and arranged to re-convene the following day to create some plans of action. But the main focus on Sunday was the protest march. Numerous banners were created to show Cuadrilla what we thought of them; one of the biggest at 8 metres by 1.5 metres and probably the least subtle simply read: ‘Frack Off’. The March set off straight after lunch and local campaign group REAF (Ribble Esturary Against Fracking) led the way. There was much enthusiastic chanting, one young woman on the megaphone had us all shouting (with as much attitude as gangsta rappers) ‘Cuadrilla, Mark Miller, toxic water spiller (Mark Miller is CEO of Cuadrilla).

It was a shame we couldn’t go right up to the drilling rigg, but as there is no public right of way and the general feeling was to stay on the right side of the law (for now at least) we settled for stopping half a mile from the rigg. The rig is surrounded by flat agricultural land so the press could still get their shots, 150 beautiful protestors in the foreground, ugly drilling rig placed undemocratically in the background. On the walk back to camp it was great to see most of the stationary cars winding down their windows to take some information on fracking, that made the demo even more worthwhile. We returned to camp to be fed (as we had been all weekend) by the 1 in 12 club from Leeds; my impression of them was great vegan food, lovely smiles and very hardworking!

And this brings us abruptly to the end of Camp Frack. After a short but productive two days, tat down began. Cobbled together marquees are a lot easier to take down than they are to put up; there were many people that stayed around to help carry the ‘hundreds’ of tables and chairs, the sun shone and our lorry went nowhere near the soggy grass.

In the days that followed Camp Frack Cuadrilla Resources have been on the PR offensive. They are looking for investment and have announced they want to drill 400 – 800 wells in the UK. I say, louder than ever, Frack off!


Further information on fracking can be found at:

http://frack-off.org.uk/

http://www.gaslandthemovie.com/whats-fracking

http://reafg.blogspot.com/

South Lakes Cycle Challenge Awards

July 28th, 2011

Winners!

Well done to all 228 people who  took part in the 2011 South Lakes Cycle Challenge. Nearly 52,000 miles were cycled in the 6 week period with 28,000 of those miles for commuting. Almost 8000Kg’s of CO2 were saved by making those trips by bike.

Thanks to Tim Farron MP for presenting the pries yesterday in a ceremony on the Brewery Arts Centre steps.

 Winner of the New or returning cyclist category: Maxine Allison from Designworks with 51 trips by bike. 2nd place Dave Howard, 3rd Jon Robinson.

Winner of the team with the highest mileage: The Lakes School with 3613 miles in total. 2nd Fleet Fox’s – LDNP, 3rd Team C -Croppers.

The Lakes School team reps collect thier prizes

Winner of the Large Organisation with the Highest Mileage overall: The Lake District National Park.

Winner of the Large Organisation with the highest mileage per emlpoyee: Wheelbase with 118 miles per employee. 2nd Brathay Trust, 3rd The Lakes School.

Winner of the Small Organisation with the highest mileage and the highest mileage per employee: the Body Rehab with 450 miles per employee. 2nd Designworks, 3rd Seeds for Change Lancaster.

Winner of the team with the most trips by bike: ICT -LDNP with 317 trips. 2nd TWP Wheelers, 3rd Miles -LDNP

Thanks to all who participated and thanks to organiser and SLACC Transport Group convenor Liz Ashburn, Cumbria County Council, Awards for All, the LDNP SDF. Thanks to the Cartmel Sticky Toffee Pudding Company, the Royalty Cinema in Bowness, Rory from Designworks and Wheelbase for donating prizes. Thanks to Designworks for thier work on the website and the Brewery for hosting the awards.

Keep cycling!

New supermarket threat to Ulverston

July 23rd, 2011
Keep Ulverston Special Campaign
- instigated by a number of local people, local businesses and councillors
This campaign has been started because Robinsons, who own the Brewery site (just off the roundabout as you come into Ulverston) have put in planning permission to South Lakeland District Council (SLDC) to build a 25,000 square feet supermarket with an underpass to an underground car park raising the existing road by 2 metres.
The campaign has got off to a flying start. A lively public meeting was held last Thursday which was full (around 400 people) at which Robinsons explained how they wanted to enhance Ulverston and that the footfall to the town would be increased. Someone in the audience pointed out that the research which gave them that information was commissioned by Tesco !
We have a petition for people to sign to oppose the plan (over 300 signatures so far) and we are urging people to write to the planning officer Kate Lawson, South Lakeland District Council, South Lakeland House Lowther St Kendal LA9 4DL.In the Autumn we have further plans with a poster campaign in the local shops leading up to the point at which SLDC will vote on the planning application.
For those of you who live in Kendal or the surrounding area a letter to the planning officer would be invaluable since there are only 6 councillors representing Ulverston and other councillors may be convinced by the principle of keeping Ulverston a market town full of thriving independent shops with the money staying in the town.
You may also consider writing to your own SLDC councillor who will have a vote.
Lastly, some of us have considered boycotting Robinsons beer until they drop the proposal – there may be more on this in the future depending on how the campaign is going.
If anyone has creative ideas as to how to grab the attention of North-West TV since Robinsons brewery is based in Stockport, Greater Manchester please let me know judyfilmore@btinternet.com

(Article contributed by Judy Filmore, Ulverston Green Party)

COLLAPSE: IT’S COMING! ARE YOU READY?

June 14th, 2011

KINGSTON, NY, 13 June 2011—

Everything is not all right. And things are going to get worse … much worse. The economy is on the threshold of calamity. Wars are spreading like wildfires. The world is on a razor’s edge.

Not so, say world leaders and mainstream media experts. Yes, there are problems, but the financiers and politicians are aware of them. Policies are already in place and measures are being taken to correct them.

Whether it’s failing economies, intractable old wars or raging new wars, the word from the top always maintains that steady progress is being made and comforts the populace with assurances that the brightest minds and the sharpest generals are in charge and on the case. On all fronts, success is certain and victory is at hand. Only “patience” is required … along with more men, more time and more money.

As far as these “leaders” and their media are concerned, the only opinions that count come from a stable of thoroughbred experts, official sources and political favorites. Only they have the credentials to speak with authority and provide trustworthy forecasts. That they are consistently, if not invariably, wrong apparently does nothing to diminish their credibility.

How can any thinking adult possibly imagine that the same central bankers, financiers and politicians responsible for creating the economic crisis are capable of resolving it? Within days of its announcement, we predicted that Bush’s TARP (Troubled Asset Relief Program) was destined to fail, and subsequently predicted the same for Obama’s stimulus package (The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act). They were no more than cover-ups; there would be no recovery.
Meet the New Plan, Same as the Old Plan

Democrat or Republican, it makes no difference. Despite the heated rhetoric, solving economic problems had less to do with the party in power and more to do with professional competence. Both sides had their turn in office. Both used their power to initiate policies that created the problems. Both sides had their shot at fixing the messes they were responsible for. Both sides failed, as we predicted. Given who they are and what they’ve done, we confidently predict an unbroken sequence of bipartisan failures in the future.

The Beltway Incompetents are in the driver’s seat. What person with a healthy instinct for self-preservation would believe the promises of politicians or trust the judgment of central bankers or Wall Street financiers whose only real interest is self interest?

Not “Business as Usual” In the 1920s, US President Calvin Coolidge declared, “The business of America is business.” Four score and 10 years later, the business of America has become war: The forty-year War on Drugs; The ten-year War on Terror; the Afghan War (longest in American history); the eight-years-and-no-end-in-sight Iraq War; the covert wars in Pakistan and Yemen; and most recently, the “time-limited, scope-limited kinetic military action” in Libya.

While the justifications for engaging in these wars were all different, all were murderous, immoral, interminable, ruinously expensive and abject failures. Why would anyone believe the optimistic battle communiqués issued by the “czars” in charge and the battlefield brass who keep reassuring the public that reapplying previously failed strategies would, this time, lead to success?

Yet even in the face of their proven failures and gross incompetence, anyone daring to challenge the party line or the conventional wisdom is dismissed as an “alarmist,” “fear monger,” or “gloom-and-doomer.” However unwelcome our forecasts may be – pessimism, optimism, like or dislike are all irrelevant – only their accuracy counts. We correctly forecast:
Afghan and Iraq Wars would be debacles
Bursting of the housing bubble
The “Gold Bull Run”
The “Panic of ’08″
European Monetary Union crisis
Failure of US bailout/stimulus packages to revive housing and create jobs
Falling governments, spreading civil wars and social upheaval on a global scale
We also said that the Federal Reserve’s sighting of economic “green shoots” in March 2009 was a “mirage” and predicted that their much vaunted “recovery” was no more than a temporary solution, a quick-fix to be followed by “The Greatest Depression.” And now, in June 2011, with the Dow on a down trend and the economic data increasingly pointing in the direction of Depression, Washington and Wall Street remain in denial. The only debate among the “experts” is whether or not a “double dip” recession is likely.

However, for the man on the street – pummeled by falling wages, higher prices, intractable unemployment, rising taxes and punitive “austerity measures” – “Depression,” not “recession,” and certainly not “prosperity,” is just around the corner.

According to a June 8th CNN/Opinion Research Corporation poll, 48 percent of Americans believe that another Great Depression is likely to occur in the next year – the highest that figure has ever reached. The survey also indicates that just under half of the respondents live in a household where someone has lost a job or is worried that unemployment may hit them in the near future.

Suddenly, after years of obvious economic hardship experienced by tens of millions of Americans – only when the suffering and pain can no longer be cloaked in abstractions and cooked statistics – does an emboldened media dare utter the forbidden “D” word.

For Trends Journal readers, alerted to this emerging trend some three years ago, the prospect of Depression should come as no surprise. Neither should the idea that, when it hits and can no longer be denied, a long suffering public will take to the streets.

When I made this forecast back then it was written off by most of the major broadcast and print media. Now, however, when one of their own, belatedly and hesitantly, raises that possibility he is elevated to sage status and it becomes big news. In early June, Democratic strategist James “It’s the Economy, Stupid” Carville, having finally mastered the higher math of adding two plus two, warned that decaying economic conditions heightened the risk of civil unrest.

As I described it all those years ago: “When people lose everything, and have nothing left to lose, they lose it.”

Trend Forecast: The wars will proliferate and civil unrest will intensify. As we forecast, the youth-inspired revolts that first erupted in North Africa and the Middle East are now breaking out in Europe (See “Off With Their Heads,” Trends Journal, Autumn 2010)

Given the trends in play and the people in power, economic collapse at some level is inevitable. Governments and central banks will be unrelenting in their determination to wring every last dollar, pound or euro from the people through taxes while confiscating public assets (a.k.a. privatization) in order to cover bad bets made by banks and financiers.

When the people have been bled dry financially and have nothing left to give, blood will flow on the streets.

Trend Lesson: Learn from history. Do you remember when it first became apparent that the US economy was in deep trouble and heading toward the “Panic of 08”? Not many will. Most people were in a summer state of mind and in holiday mode. It was late July 2007 when the stock market suddenly plunged from its euphoric 14,000 high.

Though we had warned in our Summer 2007 Trends Journal (released that June) that “trends indicators point to a major crisis hitting the financial markets between July and November,” the diving Dow was downplayed as a mere “hiccup” … a time to pause between more mouthfuls of expansion.
Biggest mistake in a falling stock market

The huge swings in the Dow are giving investors pause. But taking your money out of the market now could be the gravest mistake of all.

NEW YORK — This past Thursday was the second worst day of the year for the Dow Jones Industrial Average. But remember, it was just a week ago today that the Dow closed above 14,000 for the first (and only) time.
Fluctuations in the market shouldn’t get to the 401(k) investor. Keep in mind your time horizon – most of us are going to be invested in the market until we retire, often decades from now.

CNN 27 July 2007
Four years and trillions of dollars in stock and 401(k) losses later, that typical “take a deep breath, stay the course” advice looks tragically misguided. The Dow would eventually lose more than half its value and now, in June 2011, it’s fallen below 12,000.

The moral of this story is to not let your mind take a summer vacation. Conditions are rapidly deteriorating and it is imperative to remain on high alert. Another violent financial episode is looming. It may be triggered by economics (e.g., debt defaults and debt crisis contagion in Europe, a crashing US dollar, or commodity price spikes); it could be terror (false flag or real), a man-made disaster (another Fukushima) or one made by Mother Nature … or any combination of the above.

Publisher’s Note: To excel in any field – from gourmet chef to concert pianist to close-combat warrior – you have to practice … endlessly, over and over, until finally the training sinks in and becomes a part of you.

In that spirit, I again repeat: preparing for financial survival is a “practice.” And it has to be treated as if you are preparing for battle; expect the unexpected and prepare for the worst, which in these perilous times could be a declaration of economic martial law. Banks may close, currencies may be devalued and deposit withdrawals may be imposed. Remember Gerald Celente’s basic survival strategy, “GC’s Three G’s: Guns, Gold and a Getaway plan.”

In the Summer 2011 Trends Journal (mid-July release) we will provide practical strategies to cope with the coming collapse and offer approaches that, if implemented, could reverse the prevailing negative trends.

Consensus Workshop

May 9th, 2011

15 people attended a workshop on consensus decision making tonight:

Consensus decision making is a creative and dynamic way of reaching agreement between all members of a group. Instead of simply voting for an item and having the majority of the group getting their way, a consensus group is committed to finding solutions that everyone actively supports – or at least can live with. This makes sure that all opinions, ideas and concerns are taken into account. By listening closely to each other, the group aims to come up with proposals that work for everyone.

Consensus is neither compromise nor unanimity – it aims to go further by weaving together everyone’s best ideas and most important concerns – a process that often results in surprising and creative solutions, inspiring both the individual and the group as whole.
Working together

At the heart of consensus is a respectful dialogue between equals. It’s about everyone working together to meet both the individual’s and the group’s needs – working with each other rather than for or against each other, something that requires openness and trust.
an onion being peeled – layers marked want, really want, actually need

Consensus is looking for ‘win-win’ solutions that are acceptable to all – no decision will be made against the will of an individual or a minority. Instead the group adapts to all its members’ needs. If everyone agrees to a decision they will all be much more committed to making it happen.

Consensus decision making is based on the idea that people should have full control over their lives and that power should be shared by all, not just concentrated in the hands of a few. It’s about having the freedom to decide one’s own course in life and the right to play an equal role in creating a common future. This is why it is used widely in groups working towards a more just and equitable society such as small voluntary groups, co-operatives and campaign networks.

To learn more about consensus decision making see http://www.seedsforchange.org.uk/free/shortconsensus

Thanks to Rebecca from Seeds for Change in Lancaster for running this workshop for us.

Kendal Seed Swap

May 8th, 2011

Here’s a few photos from our Seeding Swap hosted by the Kendal Unitarian Chapel.

Kendal mayor John Veevers with seedlings to take home from the seed swap

Seedlings at the Kendal Seed Swap

Seed swap at Kendal Unitarian Chapel

The SLACC TT Monster Mural on display at the Kendal Unitarian Chapel